Do you think that Pinsent Masons LLP is a reputable firm of solicitors? If you do, think again. Not only are they morally bankrupt enough to represent the sick bullies and thugs that are Ingeus (UK) Ltd, they are even prepared to cover up for contempts of court, connive with criminals and bent filth, lie to governmental authorities to harm opposing litigants, and commit their own contempts of court to allow criminals to escape justice.
I am going to keep this post relatively short, as there are some acts committed by Pinsent Masons LLP which may well lead to them being joined to legal proceedings as defendants in the future. For now, it doesn’t make any sense to flag to them my intentions, although they are obviously already aware of the extent of their own criminality. They simply don’t care. As long as they are being paid blood money by sick, sadistic thugs, they will tell any lie and commit any criminal act just to harm an opposing litigant.
As you already know if you have read the previous post, Ingeus (UK) Ltd’s sick, twisted and corrupt in-house lawyer, Matthew “Far-Fetched Fairytale” Flood, told multiple lies on court forms in late 2015, with the intent of perverting the course of justice. The lies were so obvious that a five-year old child could see through them, but that didn’t bother Flood, who is a pathological liar to the degree that he probably does have a mental illness which needs professional treatment.
At the Directions Questionnaire stage in Claim No. B00YP012, Tara Hepworth of Pinsent Masons LLP stated on the DQ form itself that Flood was not in contempt of court. The statement was written in the usual Pinsent Masons robot-speak which also characterises all of the witness statements which their so-called “clients” submit to the courts. The CPR says that witness statements should be in the author’s own words, but Pinsent Masons will ensure that all witnesses write like coached robots.
That is not the problem here, though. The problem is that Hepworth has blatantly lied on a court document signed with a statement of truth, with the intent of interfering with the course of justice in a highly significant material respect. Or, at least, a document which SHOULD be signed with a statement of truth. Unbelievably, Hepworth has tried to con the court by signing all of the other documents in the bundle, and then just printing the words “Pinsent Masons LLP” in the signature box on the document containing the lies.
It couldn’t be any more obvious, could it? “We want to take the money off these scum, and pervert the course of justice for them, but we don’t want our own pure white arses to end up within a mile of the deceit and contempt of court which will be necessary to achieve our objective.” Hepworth has now disappeared from the scene as the litigation has moved into another gear, but this is still an act of contempt which I will be using in future applications to the court.
I believe the reason Hepworth has disappeared from the scene was that she was also involved in a criminal conspiracy which involved lying to a corrupt police officer with a pre-existing relationship with a “client”, and, as I am hot on the trail of this bent copper and about to uncover some highly significant evidence, Pinsent Masons decided not to leave the same bent lawyer on the case to avoid the risk of a course of conduct of harassment being formed. Of course, the course of conduct of harassment committed by the bent firm of lawyers itself is unaffected.
The lawyers which have replaced Hepworth are just as bad, if not worse. While Hepworth lied to the police in attempt to pervert the course of criminal justice, another extremely nasty character by the name of Gary Terence Wayne Coleman connived with the corrupt Ingeus (UK) Ltd chief executive’s office to lie to the tax authorities. The same bent lawyer has since filed a completely dishonest witness statement, signed with a false statement of truth, with the High Court in Birmingham. As the witness statement has now been aired at a public hearing, it will be published in due course.
There will be a lot more to come on Pinsent Masons LLP. For now, all I will say is stay the hell away from them if you want your case to be litigated honestly and fairly. If you want to end up in serious trouble, and possibly end up in prison because you have lied on a court document, then they will be a good choice for you. Remember, hiding behind a solicitor is no defence to contempt of court.